Metadata Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor | Robert S. Boyd, boydrob@auburn.edu | en_US |
dc.creator | Boyd, Robert S. | |
dc.creator | Wall, Michael A. | |
dc.creator | Jaffré, Tanguy | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-04T15:41:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-04T15:41:11Z | |
dc.date.created | 2009 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1656/045.016.0512 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1656/045.016.0512 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/49945 | |
dc.description.abstract | Hyperaccumulator plants mobilize large amounts of certain elements
from the soil into their tissues. Those elements then may be transferred to other organisms in those communities. Using a humid tropical forest site in New Caledonia,
we tested whether epiphytes (mosses and liverworts) growing on Ni hyperaccumulator hosts contained greater levels of Ni (and seven other metals) than those
growing on non-hyperaccumulator hosts. We selected two Ni hyperaccumulator
species, Psychotria douarrei and Hybanthus austrocaledonicus, pairing individuals
of each species with similar-sized non-hyperaccumulators and collecting epiphytes
from each for elemental analysis. Samples of epiphytes and host plant leaves were
analyzed for concentrations of eight metals (Co, Cr, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn).
Two-way ANOVA was used to assess the infl uence of host type (hyperaccumulator
or non-hyperaccumulator), epiphyte group, and the interaction term. Leaves of both
Ni hyperaccumulator species had greater Ni concentrations than the paired nonhyperaccumulator species, but leaf concentrations of other metals (Co, Cr, Fe, Pb,
and Zn) were higher as well in one or both cases. The strongest infl uence on epiphyte
elemental composition was found to be the host type factor for Ni. Epiphytes collected from hyperaccumulator hosts had signifi cantly greater Ni concentrations than
those collected from non-hyperaccumulator hosts. Epiphyte Ni concentrations often
exceeded the threshold used to defi ne Ni hyperaccumulation (1000 +g/g), showing
that some epiphytes (in most cases those growing on Ni hyperaccumulators) also
hyperaccumulate Ni. Six of the epiphytes we analyzed, four liverworts (Frullania
ramuligera, Schistochila sp., Morphotype #1 and Morphotype #13) and two mosses
(Calyptothecium sp. and Aerobryopsis wallichii), had at least one specimen containing more than 1000 +g Ni/g and hence qualify as Ni hyperaccumulators. We conclude
that Ni could move from Ni hyperaccumulator hosts to their epiphytes, either from
leachates/exudates from tissues or from accumulated external dust, thus potentially
mobilizing Ni still further into the food webs of these humid tropical forests. | en_US |
dc.format | PDF | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Northeastern Naturalist | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 1092-6194 | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2009. This is the version of record published by Eagle Hill Institute and is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Item should be cited as: Do Tropical Nickel Hyperaccumulators Mobilize Metals
into Epiphytes? A Test Using Bryophytes from New
Caledonia
Authors: Boyd, Robert S., Wall, Michael A., and Jaffré, Tanguy
Source: Northeastern Naturalist, 16(sp5) : 139-154
Published By: Eagle Hill Institute
URL: https://doi.org/10.1656/045.016.0512 | en_US |
dc.title | Do Tropical Nickel Hyperaccumulators Mobilize Metals into Epiphytes? A Test Using Bryophytes from New Caledonia | en_US |
dc.type | Text | en_US |
dc.type.genre | Journal Article, Academic Journal | en_US |
dc.citation.volume | 16 | en_US |
dc.citation.issue | SP5 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 139 | en_US |
dc.citation.epage | 254 | en_US |
dc.description.status | Published | en_US |
dc.description.peerreview | Yes | en_US |