Metadata Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor | Stephen S. Ditchkoff, ditchss@auburn.edu | en_US |
dc.creator | Karns, G. R. | |
dc.creator | Holland, A. M. | |
dc.creator | Seury, T. D. | |
dc.creator | Ditchkoff, S. S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-03T16:15:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-03T16:15:57Z | |
dc.date.created | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.evolutionary-ecology.com/abstracts/v16/2876.html | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50031 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.35099/aurora-100 | |
dc.description.abstract | Questions: How does maternal condition and regional variation in resource abundance
affect fetal sex ratio allocation, timing of litter conception, and decreased fecundity due to
senescence?
Data studied: We used female white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) maternal age and
mass and reproductive tract data (number and sex of fetuses) collected from 1995 to 2011
throughout Alabama.
Methods: Fetal sex ratio allocation: We aged collected fetuses to determine conception date
and examined the effects of maternal age and mass, litter size, and conception timing (relative
to site-specific average conception timing). Timing of litter conception: We examined effects
of maternal characteristics. Fecundity: We examined effects of maternal age and mass. In all
models, we assessed the effect of regional variation in resource abundance.
Conclusions: Fetal sex ratio allocation: The only significant predictor was conception timing,
and sons were more likely as conception date was closer to the peak of breeding. We did not
find support for Trivers-Willard or the local resource competition hypothesis. Timing of litter
conception: Maternal age, mass, and their interaction (maternal age × mass) explained conception timing, with smaller females conceiving further from the mean conception date among
younger females and larger females conceiving further from the mean conception date among
older females (likely related to reproductive output in the prior breeding season). Fecundity:
Not previously demonstrated, we found support for age-related reproductive senescence in
female white-tailed deer. | en_US |
dc.format | PDF | en_US |
dc.publisher | Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Evolutionary Ecology Research | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 1522-0613 | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2014 Gabriel R. Karns. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner. Item should be cited as: Karns, G. R., Holland, A. M., Steury, T. D., & Ditchkoff, S. S. (2014). Maternal life history of white-tailed deer: factors affecting fetal sex allocation, conception timing, and senescence. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 16(2), 165-178. | en_US |
dc.title | Maternal life history of white-tailed deer: factors affecting fetal sex allocation, conception timing, and senescence | en_US |
dc.type | Text | en_US |
dc.type.genre | Journal Article, Academic Journal | en_US |
dc.citation.volume | 16 | en_US |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 165 | en_US |
dc.citation.epage | 178 | en_US |
dc.description.status | Published | en_US |
dc.description.peerreview | Yes | en_US |
dc.creator.orcid | 0000-0001-6754-8319 | en_US |
dc.creator.orcid | 0000-0002-7414-5777 | en_US |